De-Identified Grant Proposal Review Assignment

Grant Proposal – Peer Reviews

In this paper, the focus will be on how you two de-identified grant proposals to review for this assignment . You will play the role of a grant reviewer by reading and giving feedback to two other students grant proposals (proposals will be assigned at random).

On our website we have handled this kind of grant writing works previously. Here are a few of similar tasks that might be an eye opener on the specific elements that cut across the process of grant writing.

Factors to consider in writing the Grant Proposal – Peer Reviews

There are specific elements that one has to consider in writing this kind of a proposal grant proposal review

  • Must be three to six double-spaced pages in length (not including the title or reference pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
  • Must address the following areas of the proposal you are reviewing:
    • Specific Aims: Does the proposed study seem adequate to achieve these specific aims? – a grant has to be convincing by directly identifying the required aims
    • Background: Does the literature review justify the need for the study? Are there any gaps or missing data in the literature review? – present data on the existing literature
    • Significance: Does the proposed study improve scientific knowledge, technical capability and/or clinical practice? – relative to the aims, the significance element looks at the contribution that will be benefit by adopting the study.
    • Proposed Study: Does the proposed study methodology answer the hypotheses listed in the Background section? Is the proposed methodology sufficient to achieve the stated specific aims?
  • Format the paper according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.



Get a 15 % discount on an order above $ 100
Use the following coupon code :
error: Content is protected !!